Population and
Sustainable Development
newzealand.govt.nz
www.stats.govt.nz
Phase 3 - developing and analysing alternatives
Home
Site objective
Introduction to population
Information by subject
Tools and resources
Eight-step checklist
Policy development cycle
Interpreting data
Designing statistical tables
Public policy can change demographics
Framework for analysing population structure
New trends in topical population issues
Getting the bigger picture - three common misunderstandings
Glossary
Myth busters
Population faq
Contact us
About us
Ask a question
Help
Search criteria
Search
Feedback
What do you think?
If you've got feedback we'd love to hear it
Send Feedback
Statistics New Zealand
Department of Labour
Ministry of Economic Development
Ministry of Social Development
Go to the newzealand.govt.nz website
Tools and resources
>
Policy development cycle
>
Phase 1 - strategic phase
Phase 2 - defining the problem
Phase 3 - developing and analysing alternatives
Phase 4 - presenting recommendations to decision-makers
Phase 5 - service delivery
Phase 6 - evaluation
If modelling work is being initiated, have we considered carefully the nature of the policy conclusions the modelling will need to support? Will the model have the flexibility to easily vary key population parameters to test the sensitivity of results?
Is the data set of sufficient size to permit analysis at the level of disaggregation being attempted (eg by age, sex, ethnicity, labour force status)?
Do we need to refer to specific guidelines for developing policy for particular population groups (eg gender analysis, Pacific Peoples’ perspectives, and Ethnic Peoples’ perspectives)?
Do we need to conduct sensitivity analysis for different policy-relevant sub-groups?
How are we allowing for possible behavioural changes, and for incidence-shifting, in estimating the response of service groups and others to policy changes? Do we need to consider the impacts of previous policy changes and the responses of sub-groups to those changes?
Do we need to estimate the impacts of changes on both standard and relevant non-standard sub-groups of the population? For instance, low-income working families in addition to the usual categories of age, sex, and ethnicity? Do we need to consider possible impacts on particularly vulnerable groups?
Do we need to consider ways of mitigating adverse impacts on sub-groups by varying the policy or service delivery mode?
What are the possible system-wide, cross-sectoral, and long-term behavioural effects of policy or service delivery changes?
Have we considered how the impacts of the policy or service change will be monitored and evaluated?